Skip to main content

What was it like to meet Richard Feynman? Anecdote by Neil King



I sat in on Physics X at Caltech for a year: This is where Feynman would take questions from freshmen and sophomores, and try to answer them. He didn't like the more 'formal' questions that upper-division and grad students would ask: he wanted questions driven by real curiosity.

I had a lot of fun in Physics X: One time I mentioned something that had bugged more for a long time: "Why is the gamma function generally considered the 'natural generalization' of n-factorial (n!)?". He didn't answer directly; instead, he turned to the classroom and issued a challenge: "Over the break, think about this: 'What is (1/2)!, the factorial of (1/2)?' OK, Merry Christmas!"

Three students actually thought about this over the break. One girl pointed out that (d/dx)^n[x^n] = n!; I thought something could be done with that. Another fellow expanded the factorial function in a complex power series about z = (1/2,0), imposing the conditions that (z +1)! = (z+1)*z! and also that 1! = 1 = 0!; he carried this out to more and more terms.

I picked up the idea about the repeated differentiation, and combined it with the fact that a repeated integral also incorporates the factorial function. (See
mathworld.wolfram.com/RepeatedIntegral.ht ml ; you'll need to remove the space).
For integer values, the relationship between n! and the nth repeated integral is just true. I co-defined non-integral values of n! AND non-integral repeated integrals so that the relationship would still be true. I then proved that relationship between the gamma function and the beta function (See:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beta_function#Relationship_between_gamma_function_and_beta_function)
also held for my extension of the factorial. I was 95% of the way there, but I got stuck on one point: once I could figure out one value, for n = 1/2, I could immediately show that any continuous function that was defined in my way had to be the famous gamma function.

On the first Monday evening of the new calendar year, only 4 people showed up: the three factorialists and Feynman. Feynman was delighted at what we had found: It all reminded him of things he had worked on previously. I think he pointed out something very easy that I hadn't finished thinking through (basically integration by parts; I can't find my notebook to see why that would have been a problem), and then boom!, I had (1/2)! = sqrt(pi)/2; knew my definition of n! = gamma(n+1); and had a definition for non-integer iterations of integration and differentiation, all together.

Feynman dug it. Then he gave me a bit of advice: "Don't tell anyone. Just wait. Someday, someone will have a problem, and this will be the answer to it. Just bring it out then. And then when they ask you, 'How did you figure that out?', you just say, 'Oh, I discovered that when I was just a kid.'!"

I ran into Feynman at the Caltech cafeteria, and he invited me to join him for lunch three different times. This was the highlight of my year at Caltech.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Capture and compare stdout in python unit tests

A recent fan of TDD, I set out to write tests for whatever comes my way. And there was one feature where the code would print messages to the console. Now - I had tests written for the API but I could not get my head around ways to capture these messages in my unittests. After some searching and some stroke of genius, here's how I accomplished capturing stdout.

On working remote

The last company I worked for, did have an office space, but the code was all on Github, infra on AWS, we tracked issues over Asana and more or less each person had at least one project they could call "their own" (I had a bunch of them ;-)). This worked pretty well. And it gave me a feeling that working remote would not be very different from this. So when we started working on our own startup, we started with working from our homes. It looked great at first. I could now spend more time with Mom and could work at leisure. However, it is not as good as it looks like. At times it just feels you are busy without business, that you had been working, yet didn't achieve much. If you are evaluating working from home and are not sure of how to start, or you already do (then please review and add your views in comments) and feel like you were better off in the office, do read on. Remote work is great. But a physical office is better. So if you can, find yourself a co-working s

The economics of crypto investing

If you believe in the greater fool theory, there is no other market as speculative and volatile as the crypto market today. We are perhaps living in the biggest bubble of our times. I am not bullish on this market in particular. I am bullish on the mania. 90% of the cryptos we see today will crash. They are just tokens with no tangible value generation capability. However, I believe that the mania and euphoria will stay. Having said that, should one consider investing in this market? Certainly! The risk/reward is lovely, potential upsides and margins are huge and with 3-5% of your net worth, the bet on the mania is worth it. How does one choose where to invest? If you follow the stock markets, you are expected to do thorough Fundamental Analysis before investing. Expect the same for the crypto market. I invest in large caps. I invest in index funds. And I invest over and over again. Markets rise, always. Extrapolating the same strategy - invest in indices - the top 10 tokens by